- From: Sam Ruby <rubys@intertwingly.net>
- Date: Mon, 30 Mar 2009 05:47:05 -0400
- To: Henri Sivonen <hsivonen@iki.fi>
- CC: Dana Lee Ling <dleeling@comfsm.fm>, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>, HTML WG <public-html@w3.org>
Henri Sivonen wrote: > On Mar 30, 2009, at 05:58, Dana Lee Ling wrote: > >> Please do not forget those of us who choose to hand author XHTML + >> SVG. We exist. > > The SVG in text/html stuff involves no syntactic changes to SVG in > application/xhtml+xml. Silverlight is an example of a vocabulary that is truly draconian. Not just at the syntax level, but at the DOM level. Add a single element that is not recognized, and none of the image is drawn. Not one bit. By contrast, every SVG rendering engine I've come across will render what it can from the DOM it is presented. As someone who routinely hand authors XHTML + SVG (and have done so for years), it disappoints me that this discussion so far has focused on the easily correctable issues. Ones that can be corrected in seconds by the use of the following web service: http://services.philip.html5.org/html-to-xhtml/ - Sam Ruby
Received on Monday, 30 March 2009 09:48:03 UTC