- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:26:31 -0400
- To: James Graham <jgraham@opera.com>
- CC: public-html@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, James- James Graham wrote (on 3/24/09 10:37 AM): > Henri Sivonen wrote: >> >> If we want the list to be more malleable than the rest of the >> algorithm definition document, the algorithm spec should have a link >> to a URI which will dereference to the latest list at any given point >> in time. A great bonus would be if the document at the URI came with >> revision history. > > That sounds acceptable to me from the point of view of implementing this > in html5lib. (For comparison, it would not be acceptable if I was > expected to reconstruct the list myself from some version of the SVG spec). Just curious... given that SVG already has those lists as Appendices, as I mentioned to Henri, is that still a burden? It's trivial for the SVG WG to maintain such a definitive list, and we're willing to do so, but I'm wondering about the nature of your concern. Actually, I think it would be advisable for all W3C specs to maintain such a list. Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Tuesday, 24 March 2009 15:33:24 UTC