- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:30:28 -0400
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Dr. Olaf- Thanks for your comments. We'll get them into the Tracker right away. In the meantime, though, could you change your subject-line header? We forgot to put the proper keyword in, so it's our fault... Instead of "[SVG Transforms 1.0, Part 2: Language (2009-03-20)]", could you just preface your subject line with "[Transforms]"? That would make it easier to read (some people in the past have complained about long subject lines, and in my email client, your preface is pretty much all I see). Putting the date in is a good idea, so we know which draft you're talking about... but maybe instead of putting it in the subject line, you could actually just put a link to the section of the spec you're talking about, using the long-date (not short-name) version of the spec? Like this: http://www.w3.org/TR/2009/WD-SVG-Transforms-20090320/#animate-transform-extensions Best Regards- -Doug Schepers W3C Team Contact, SVG and WebApps WGs
Received on Sunday, 22 March 2009 18:30:38 UTC