[Bug 4930] multiple <missing-glyph>

http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=4930


Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |cam@mcc.id.au




--- Comment #1 from Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>  2009-06-07 21:09:44 ---
CSS says the following about selecting "missing glyphs":

  The UA should map each character for which it has no suitable font to a
  visible symbol chosen by the UA, preferably a "missing character" glyph from
  one of the font faces available to the UA.

So in practice, it shouldn't make a difference whether we said that the first
or last <missing-glyph> is used.


-- 
Configure bugmail: http://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the QA contact for the bug.

Received on Sunday, 7 June 2009 21:09:51 UTC