- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Thu, 23 Jul 2009 17:10:19 +0200
- To: Helder Magalhães <helder.magalhaes@gmail.com>
- Cc: Bradley Neuberg <bradneuberg@gmail.com>, svg-developers@yahoogroups.com, www-svg WG <www-svg@w3.org>
On Jul 23, 2009, at 10:26 , Helder Magalhães wrote:
> Nevertheless, I still find the <script type="image/svg+xml"> [1]
> approach sounds a bit of a hack and hope to investigate further in
> order to understand if it's possible to use more standards markup.
It might not be ideal for various reasons, but it's pretty much
standard so long as it's properly labelled with the correct media
type. The main issue is that semantically it means that it's not part
of the content, but I can live with that. It's certainly a work-around
that's simple and works well!
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
Feel like hiring me? Go to http://robineko.com/
Received on Thursday, 23 July 2009 15:11:01 UTC