- From: Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc>
- Date: Tue, 28 Apr 2009 08:12:18 -0700
- To: Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com>
- Cc: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>, public-html@w3.org, www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On 4/27/09, Jeff Schiller <codedread@gmail.com> wrote: > On 4/27/09, Jonas Sicking <jonas@sicking.cc> wrote: >> And more importantly, why do you expect a UA implementor to pay more >> attention to something that the spec 'strongly encourages' than >> something that the spec 'encourages'? >> >> As a UA implementor I think I tend to pay more attention to what *I* >> think is important today than what the spec author thought was >> important when the spec was written. >> > > On 3/26/09, Jonas Sicking wrote [1]: >> I'm fine with making this wording stronger (as Jeff Schiller >> suggested). We could also add wording like "This is especially >> encouraged in places where UAs already expose the source of the >> document". > > I guess your opinion changed from a month ago? No, I am still fine with adding the word 'strongly'. But I don't think it will make any difference as far as affecting UA behavior. / Jonas
Received on Tuesday, 28 April 2009 15:12:59 UTC