Re: 'image-fit' vs preserveAspectRatio from Simon Pieters on 2009-04-22 (www-svg@w3.org from April 2009)

From: Simon Pieters <simonp@opera.com>
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:52:25 +0200
To: fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net>
Cc: "Grant, Melinda" <melinda.grant@hp.com>, "www-style@w3.org" <www-style@w3.org>, "www-svg@w3.org" <www-svg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <op.usr2tnzoidj3kv@zcorpandell.linkoping.osa>

On Tue, 21 Apr 2009 20:51:29 +0200, fantasai <fantasai.lists@inkedblade.net> wrote:

> Erik Dahlström wrote:
>>
>>>> Previously, the CSS spec had the same keywords as SVG. What's
>>>> the reason for the change?
...
> Actually, the original name in the CSS draft was copied from SMIL
> and was 'fit', not 'preserveAspectRatio'.

But the *keywords* were fill | hidden | meet | slice, where meet and slice are the same as in SVG.

-- 
Simon Pieters
Opera Software

Received on Wednesday, 22 April 2009 08:27:27 UTC