- From: Cameron McCormack <cam@mcc.id.au>
- Date: Tue, 7 Apr 2009 17:21:57 +1000
- To: 向雅 <fyaoxy@gmail.com>, www-svg@w3.org
Cameron McCormack: > Yes, that seems to be a contradiction. The SVG 1.1 DTD allows > <font-face> only as a child of <font>. The SVG 1.0 DTD, however, allows > <font-face> as a child of container elements (such as <g>) too. I’m half wrong: those two sentences aren’t a contradiction. It says that every <font> element must have a <font-face> child, but it doesn’t say that every <font-face> must be a child of a <font>. The SVG 1.1 DTD is inconsistent with the text of the chapter, though, since it allows a <font-face> only as a child of <font>. -- Cameron McCormack ≝ http://mcc.id.au/
Received on Tuesday, 7 April 2009 07:22:41 UTC