- From: David Woolley <forums@david-woolley.me.uk>
- Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2008 19:00:29 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote: > that the effect is gained with other methods (what should be > always possible even without using the not always existing > inverse matrix, because the document contains much more > information about the transformations than only the CTM)? Can you provide a concrete example. I would have though that, if the inverse didn't exist, there will always be points that don't have a unique image when the transform is reversed. > -- David Woolley Emails are not formal business letters, whatever businesses may want. RFC1855 says there should be an address here, but, in a world of spam, that is no longer good advice, as archive address hiding may not work.
Received on Saturday, 27 September 2008 18:01:18 UTC