Re: [1.2T-LC] attributeType auto (ISSUE-2082)

Hello,

yes, I think, this avoids unintended surprises and is
therefore fine and a satisfactory solution of the 
problem. Thanks.

Olaf


Anthony Grasso:
> Hi Dr. Hoffmann,
>
> Dr. Olaf Hoffmann wrote:
> > Anthony Grasso:
> >> Hi Dr. Hoffmann,
> >>
> >> The SVG Working Group discussed ISSUE-2082 and we agree that it seems to
> >> be underspecified and needs to be addressed.
> >>
> >> As you know, however, CSS styling is not required for SVG Tiny 1.2 and
> >> the behaviour of implementations regarding this attribute is currently
> >> unknown.
> >>
> >> Would you be comfortable with this issue being postponed and addressed
> >> in the SVG Core time frame where it will be more relevant?
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> > there is no need to solve the problem completely already in SVG1.2,
> > but then there are still some minor adjustments to do to avoid that
> > something nasty happens, if an implementor really starts to implement,
> > what is currently defined for "auto" ;o)
>
> Yes, I believe this is something we may comeback to address in Core 2.0,
> that said we have made a change in SVG Tiny 1.2.
>
> > Up to now I do not really understand, what might be intended by the
> > change in SVGT1.2 compared to SVG1.1 or SMIL, therefore I cannot
> > even suggest something, how to avoid problems.
>
> This was a tricky one. However, based on the feedback you presented in your
> previous emails regarding this issue, Doug and I constructed wording [1]
> that we believe solves the problems for "auto" that you pointed out.
>
> Please let us know at your earliest convenience if the wording we've put in
> is satisfactory.
>
> Kind Regards,
>
> Anthony Grasso.
>
>
> [1]
> http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/animate.html#AttributeTypeAttri
>bute

Received on Thursday, 16 October 2008 11:04:59 UTC