Re: [1.2T-LC] Comments on Last Call WD of SVG T1.2

Doug,

Doug Schepers a écrit :
> Hi, Cyril-
> 
> Cyril Concolato wrote (on 10/13/08 7:03 AM):
>> * Section "Status of this document"
>> It says that the CR exit criteria is "two interoperable implementations
>> for each test in the SVG Tiny 1.2 test suite". Is it two
>> implementations, each passing all tests; or for each test, two passing
>> implementation ?
> 
> The latter: for each test, we must have two passing implementations.
> This has always been the criteria for the SVG specifications, though SVG
> 1.2 Tiny includes the additional constraint that one of the passing
> implementations must be a mobile UA.
Thanks for the clarification. 

> Please note that the CR test suite is not to test conformance of
> implementations (though it is sometimes used that way for marketing
> purposes), but rather to test the interoperable implementability of the
> specification itself (i.e., it is a test of the spec, not of the viewers).
Indeed, I use it to check our implementation.

Cyril

> I would dearly love to have the resources to make a more complete test
> suite suitable for testing conformance.  This incarnation of the SVG WG
> is very interested in developing tests in parallel with writing the
> spec.  The SVG Interest Group is also doing some testing activities (SVG
> Torture Tests) for some pragmatic combinations of features, to try to
> get widespread interoperability.  If you or anyone else is interested in
> helping with this, please contact me offlist.
> 
> Regards-
> -Doug
> 


-- 
Cyril Concolato
Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor
Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group
Département Traitement du Signal et Images
/Dept. Signal and Image Processing
Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications
46 rue Barrault
75 013 Paris, France
http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat 

Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:33:22 UTC