- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Tue, 14 Oct 2008 05:32:40 +0200
- To: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Doug, Doug Schepers a écrit : > Hi, Cyril- > > Cyril Concolato wrote (on 10/13/08 7:03 AM): >> * Section "Status of this document" >> It says that the CR exit criteria is "two interoperable implementations >> for each test in the SVG Tiny 1.2 test suite". Is it two >> implementations, each passing all tests; or for each test, two passing >> implementation ? > > The latter: for each test, we must have two passing implementations. > This has always been the criteria for the SVG specifications, though SVG > 1.2 Tiny includes the additional constraint that one of the passing > implementations must be a mobile UA. Thanks for the clarification. > Please note that the CR test suite is not to test conformance of > implementations (though it is sometimes used that way for marketing > purposes), but rather to test the interoperable implementability of the > specification itself (i.e., it is a test of the spec, not of the viewers). Indeed, I use it to check our implementation. Cyril > I would dearly love to have the resources to make a more complete test > suite suitable for testing conformance. This incarnation of the SVG WG > is very interested in developing tests in parallel with writing the > spec. The SVG Interest Group is also doing some testing activities (SVG > Torture Tests) for some pragmatic combinations of features, to try to > get widespread interoperability. If you or anyone else is interested in > helping with this, please contact me offlist. > > Regards- > -Doug > -- Cyril Concolato Maître de Conférences/Associate Professor Groupe Mutimedia/Multimedia Group Département Traitement du Signal et Images /Dept. Signal and Image Processing Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Télécommunications 46 rue Barrault 75 013 Paris, France http://tsi.enst.fr/~concolat
Received on Tuesday, 14 October 2008 03:33:22 UTC