W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > October 2008

Re: [1.2T-LC] i18n comment 7: Only tb-rl (ISSUE-2108)

From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2008 23:00:46 -0400
Message-ID: <48F016DE.3080806@w3.org>
To: ishida@w3.org
CC: www-svg@w3.org, public-i18n-core@w3.org

Hi, I18N-

ishida@w3.org wrote (on 10/10/08 3:43 PM):
> Comment from the i18n review of: 
> http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/WD-SVGMobile12-20080915/
> Comment 7 At http://www.w3.org/International/reviews/0810-svg-tiny/ 
> Editorial/substantive: E Tracked by: RI
> Location in reviewed document: 10.6.1
> [http://www.w3.org/TR/SVGMobile12/text.html#TextLayoutIntroduction]
> Comment: "For top-to-bottom text, the block-progression-direction
> always points 90 degrees counter-clockwise from the reference
> orientation vector because the only available top-to-bottom writing
> mode is tb-rl."
> I think this sentence needs to be deleted, since SVG Tiny doesn't
> support vertical text. If it is there as a general statement, it
> should be made clearer, and corrected to say that tb-rl is not the
> only vertical writing mode.

I've removed the offending sentence, but be warned that it may return in
SVG Full.  How would you reword this in light of writing-mode="tb-lr"
(for Mongolian, Manchu and Phags-pa script), a value not covered in SVG
1.1 Full?

Please let us know if this satisfies your comment, in terms of the SVG
1.2 Tiny spec.

Received on Saturday, 11 October 2008 03:00:58 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:20 UTC