- From: Doug Schepers <schepers@w3.org>
- Date: Sun, 02 Nov 2008 18:08:10 -0500
- To: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
- CC: www-svg@w3.org
Hi, Julien- Thanks again for your comment... reply inline. Julien Reichel wrote (on 10/24/08 3:24 AM): > > Thank you for your answer. I'm not sure I understand your answer corecly: > > You are saying that: > 1) you think the restriction on the modification of the href while the > element is in the tree is necessary and thus you will keep it ? > This address my comment and I am satisfied with it. I believe this is an > important restriction. > > 2) You do not want to add additional restriction on the modification of > xml:id (or id) of ellement already in the tree, because this is alleady > implemented in most UA and in many content "in the wild", and you don't > think this is a necessary restriction ? > This address my comment, and altrough I still think that if no > restriction is imposed on xml:id then this will impose the same burden > on implementation as if the href could be modified. I'm not happy with > the answer but I understand and I am "satified" with it. > > Now, to re-send you erik's question: > what append when the xml:id of an element targeted by an animation is > modified ? > - no effect the animation continue. > - an exception is raised > - The animation stops (or start) on the new target (and stop on teh old > target). > > If there is no restriction on the modification of the xml:id of element > in the tree and the target of an animation, then a note should be added > to say that the result is not specified and will be UA dependent... We have made the change you requested: http://dev.w3.org/SVG/profiles/1.2T/publish/animate.html#TargetElement Since you have already indicated your satisfaction with the rest of the issue, we have marked you as being satisfied with our resolution of ISSUE-2094. If this is not the case, please let us know. Regards- -Doug
Received on Sunday, 2 November 2008 23:08:22 UTC