- From: Jonathan Chetwynd <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 16 Jul 2008 10:36:55 +0100
- To: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 09:37:42 UTC
I'm also a little mystified by this test... is it possible there is a typo? W3C_SVG_12_TinyTestSuite.tar/svg/paint-grad-17-t.svg from http://www.w3.org/Graphics/SVG/Test/ is this perhaps a CSS issue? could not find a reference in SVG1.2t regards Jonathan Chetwynd j.chetwynd@btinternet.com http://www.openicon.org/ +44 (0) 20 7978 1764 On 16 Jul 2008, at 09:03, Julien Reichel wrote: > > Hi, > > > Can somebody point out to me which part of SVGT 1.2 specification > explain the notion of fallback for gradient ? I cannot find were > this is > specified. > > This fallback is tested in paint-grad-17-t, but none of the UA I am > using (Opera, InkScape, Firefox, ...) is capable of passing this test. > > Julien > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- > > Julien Reichel, PhD > Technology Architect, SpinetiX S.A. > PSE-C, CH-1015, Lausanne, Switzerland > > Tel: +41 (0) 21 693 89 81 > Mail: julien.reichel@spinetix.com > Get Information : http://www.spinetix.com > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > -- >
Received on Wednesday, 16 July 2008 09:37:42 UTC