- From: Julien Reichel <Julien.Reichel@spinetix.com>
- Date: Mon, 7 Jul 2008 15:14:24 +0200
- To: "Dr. Olaf Hoffmann" <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, > I personally think, that the reference image is anyway often > of very limited use for animation tests. Animation tests I > create typically do not rely on reference images and several > of them try to be selfconsistent, indicating at least typical > errors of the tested feature in an easy way even for smaller > deviations. But this is not completely trivial to have for > any feature to be tested and for many things tested it is not > really necessary to have a precision test. As here the timing > of the marker is not centered, therefore it is only a help to > get a rough impression of the timing - it is already much > better than to have no indication at all ;o) > I agree with you. And I already find the work done for generating this test suite very impressive :-) > > > The animation of the #markergroup in animate-elem-40-t is > actually a > > very good example of small details that can be easily > overlooked. And > > the fact that its an animation of a use that will itself be > referenced > > by another use, makes it a complicate case to test. > > > Well for this test it is the intention of some subtests to > test the behaviour of use, therefore it should be no > complication to reuse the markers. Well actually this animation on the marker pointed out a bug in our player that none of the test for the "use" showed. None of the official test specific for the "use" tests the following case: - animation of an attribute in a use, which is itself included in another part of the document with another use. I thinks (but I must check again that you have such test on your web page). Julien
Received on Monday, 7 July 2008 13:15:01 UTC