Re: Feedback on SVGWG's SVG-in-text/html proposal

On Thu, 28 Aug 2008, Doug Schepers wrote:
> 
> It would very useful for us to know how you are prioritizing your 
> upcoming actions.

Right now I'm just going based on the date of the e-mails, oldest e-mail 
first, skipping past certain issues that are of lower importance (like 
getting the references right). I will be working on Web Forms 2 
integration relatively soon, which will take a while. I also prioritise 
folders with lots of pending input and deal with those occasionally.

However, if there is something that should be dealt with quicker, drop me 
a mail and I'll be happy to change the order to accommodate your needs.


> In particular, what is the timeframe for the various browser vendors to 
> seriously consider implementing this feature?  We would like to be 
> responsive to these considerations, as far as we are able.

I'm not sure what the current prioritisation of parser-level changes are 
in terms of the four major desktop browsers. If any of the vendors have 
any input here it would be quite helpful.

I am aware of two implementations of the parser model currently commented 
out in the spec, though, at least one of which is being used in a number 
of places.


> Resolving this matter is a major priority to the SVG WG, but we also 
> have other matters to resolve that may be more urgent, a conundrum that 
> I'm sure you appreciate.

Indeed I do.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Thursday, 28 August 2008 11:30:45 UTC