W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > April 2008

Re: SVGT 1.2 Tests: paint-stroke-205-t assumptions wrong?

From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2008 13:03:07 +0100
To: www-svg@w3.org
Message-Id: <200804251403.07871.Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>


pretty helpful, that you find this.
I think, when I created this test, I did not see 
'... go backwards in the path data specification within the current
subpath ...'

I think, you are right, this needs to be fixed and some subtests
to be modified to be useful ;o)

>As a side note, the test case could be split over multiple files to make
>it easier to map the SVG content to shapes on the screen.

Yes, it is very compact. On the other hand, it is about a very specific 
feature and it might look a little bit curious to have 20 tests on just
one feature ;o) 
Maybe it could help to add some desc elements or to extend the title elements?
(for some other reasons, I think in general, it could be an improvement to
have more title and desc elements in test suite samples ;o)
Received on Friday, 25 April 2008 12:18:08 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:18 UTC