- From: Robin Berjon <robin@berjon.com>
- Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2007 11:59:08 +0200
- To: Erik Dahlström <ed@opera.com>
- Cc: www-svg <www-svg@w3.org>
On Jun 21, 2007, at 14:33, Erik Dahlström wrote:
> The multiple conflicting places seems like something the WG should
> discuss and fix.
>
> However, the spec says in Appendix D [3]:
> "In the case of a conflict between the prose of this specification
> and the RelaxNG schema, the prose is authoritative (for example,
> the prose description of some attributes has an EBNF grammar for
> allowed values, which the RelaxNG is not able to express)."
The reason there's a difference between the two sources (the appendix
is generated from the RNG) is because we went back and forth a few
times on this attribute, and at some point they must've gotten out of
sync. If memory serves, it being animatable was the final desired
option (at least it's the one I agree with, so it must be right).
If you need help running the script that generates the appendix, holler.
--
Robin Berjon - http://berjon.com/
------------------------------------------------------------------------
"And all dared to brave unknown terrors, to do mighty deeds, to boldly
split infinitives that no man had split before."
-- Douglas Adams
Received on Tuesday, 26 June 2007 09:59:28 UTC