- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 02:48:42 +0100
- To: "C. Scott Ananian" <cscott@cscott.net>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Friday, February 23, 2007, 6:52:23 PM, C. wrote: CSA> Section 13.1 of the SVG 1.1 (14 January 2003) CSA> specification refers to a 'solidColor' element, which it claims CSA> is described in section 12. Its an error. It should have been removed. CSA> Section 11.1 also mentions that CSA> "solid colors are just specific types of paint servers" and CSA> uses the same link target to section 12 for 'solid colors' as CSA> section 13.1 does for 'solidColor'. CSA> Section 12 does not describe a 'solidColor' element, and it is CSA> not present in Appendix A's DTD. CSA> Google tells me that 'solidColor' was present in the 15 February CSA> 2002 version of the SVG 1.1 spec, and was deleted because it was CSA> to be moved to SVG 1.2 (and, indeed, it is present in the SVG 1.2 CSA> Tiny Candidate Recommendation). Thats right. And we missed the couple of references that you noted. CSA> It appears that the element was CSA> incompletely deleted from the SVG 1.1 specification; in my CSA> opinion sections 11.1 and 13.1 should be mentioned in the errata for the SVG 1.1 spec. CSA> --scott They will be. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Saturday, 24 February 2007 01:48:32 UTC