- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 8 Feb 2007 11:06:35 +0100
- To: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Thursday, February 8, 2007, 4:20:10 AM, Jonathan wrote: JW> Chris Lilley wrote: >> JW> Defining the term "glyph cell" inside the definition for "bounding box" is the >> JW> wrong place to do it. In my opinion this sentence: >> >> JW> For example, for horizontal text, the calculations must assume >> JW> that each glyph extends vertically to the full ascent and descent >> JW> values for the font. >> >> Which is therefore talking of the em square, not the glyph cell. JW> Here I'm confused. You just said "glyph cell" is not the same as em square, but JW> here the text seems to be defining glyph cell. Yes, I'm agreeing with you that its using the wrong term for what it is trying to say. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 8 February 2007 10:06:56 UTC