- From: ~:'' ありがとうございました。 <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Date: Wed, 12 Dec 2007 21:36:06 +0000
- To: "~:'' ありがとうございました。" <j.chetwynd@btinternet.com>
- Cc: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-svg@w3.org
oops, seems I may be getting the hang of this... probably not but... cheers Jonathan Chetwynd Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet On 12 Dec 2007, at 21:21, ~:'' ありがとうございました。 wrote: Chris, once again I'm struggling with this... how do I demonstrate that a given code sample is "valid to the SVG Tiny 1.2 relaxNG schema" not to myself, but to a non-technical audience, who would just like to see the magic "congratulations this code validates..." preferably on a w3c validator. regards Jonathan Chetwynd Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet On 12 Dec 2007, at 18:53, Chris Lilley wrote: On Wednesday, December 12, 2007, 12:31:07 PM, ~:'' wrote: ~?> Chris, ~?> thanks so much for the quick response. ~?> I have tried to understand what you wrote, ~?> (schema superceding DTD was of interest... ~:") ~?> but remain concerned, ~?> the w3c validator cannot validate mixed namespaces. ~?> is there any advice about when this might be resolved? Thats another limitation of DTDs - non namespace aware. They can sort of be faked, but not really dealt with. Thats another reason people move to other schema languages. ~?> If foreignObject with html will not validate, this makes it less than ~?> useful: ~?> http://www.w3.org/TR/SVG11/extend.html#AnExample ~?> for instance does not validate It makes the DTD validation less useful, yes. The content is still valuable. ~?> similarly I cannot find a way to link to external RDF that validates. ~?> ie not a comment. ~?> My concern is that, whilst I have a little understanding, the larger ~?> audience of people who are not aware of SVG, expect code to validate, ~?> and most especially code written by an accessibility consultant. Validating is fine in general. Validating *to a DTD* is a dead end, however. As you said, it doesn't work as soonas you extend into multiple namespaces. ~?> it's not sufficient to suggest "don't use foreignObject or RDF" Agreed (and I didn't). ~?> Jonathan Chetwynd ~?> Accessibility Consultant on Media Literacy and the Internet -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Co-Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 12 December 2007 21:36:21 UTC