- From: Mark Birbeck <mark.birbeck@x-port.net>
- Date: Fri, 12 May 2006 18:03:41 +0100
- To: <www-svg@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <011801c675e6$065c06a0$7e01a8c0@Jan>
Hi Jean-Claude, I was suggesting empty: observer="" rather than not present. The current spec allows for not present, but the content must be the ID of another element, i.e., it can't be empty. Having said all of this, my recollection when I did some work on this for our Sidewinder Viewer is that the missing piece of the jigsaw is actually in DOM 2 Events, is it not? Registering on the root node is possible (obviously), but not the document object itself. It's a while since I've looked at this, so I could be wrong...and if it's true it may already be addressed in DOM 3 Events. Regards, Mark Mark Birbeck CEO x-port.net Ltd. e: Mark.Birbeck@x-port.net t: +44 (0) 20 7689 9232 b: http://internet-apps.blogspot.com/ w: http://www.formsPlayer.com/ Download our XForms processor from http://www.formsPlayer.com/ _____ From: Jean-Claude Dufourd [mailto:jean-claude.dufourd@streamezzo.com] Sent: 12 May 2006 15:42 To: Mark Birbeck Cc: www-svg@w3.org Subject: Re: [SVGMobile12] STZLC3-9 listening to document events Mark Birbeck wrote: However, one thing that does strike me is that if we agree that observer becomes a URI then this could just fall out by using an empty @observer value. Is that the kind of solution others were thinking of? Reading the current XML events spec, I see for the definition of observer: The optional observer attribute specifies the id of the element with which the event listener is to be registered. If this attribute is not present, the observer is the element that the event attribute is on (...), or the parent of that element (...). So an empty observer already has meaning. We thought about this too. Best regards JC -- Jean-Claude Dufourd - Chief Scientist, Streamezzo 83, Bd du Montparnasse 75006 Paris - Tel: +33 (0) 153632847 http://www.streamezzo.com - Fax: +33 (0) 142224601
Received on Friday, 12 May 2006 17:05:26 UTC