- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 18:18:01 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: T Rowley <tor@cs.brown.edu>
Hello www-svg, T Rowley <tor@cs.brown.edu> wrote: > Section 5.9.2 states "SVG User Agents *must* implement progressive > rendering..." 'Must' doesn't seem right, as there types of SVG User > Agents that only need one-shot rendering, and the definition of > progressive rendering is lax enough that one could implement a > "progressive" rendering implementation that only renders when the > entire document is ready. While sympathetic to this point of view, we have found that implementor feedback tells us the definitions of progressive rendering do have value, for example in precluding an update when an element is in the unresolved state. We do have some tests for this functionality, so there are testable aspects. We can't really specify a time within which an update may be generated, but we can for example make tests that server part of an svg file, leave a given element in an unresolved state for some longtime (minutes) and require that the update not show the unresolved element. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 16:18:14 UTC