- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:29:12 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Hello www-svg, Bjoern wrote: > This still suggest that attributeType='CSS' and attributeType='XML' > are interchangable in SVG Tiny 1.2 documents Yes, in standalone SVGT 1.2 documents > which is still not the case, As stated several times now, the attributeType is purely to disambiguate in the case of a clash where there is a property of a given name (but not expressed as an attribute) and an attribute of the same name. It does *not*, as you seem to assume, also mean an entirely different lexical space. > to mention one more difference, the to/from/values attributes > must not use scientific notation of numbers when animating properties > while they may when animating the presentation attribute. That is incorrect, and not a position that is derivable from the specification. Properties expressed as attributes can of course use scientific notation. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Interaction Domain Leader Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 12:29:19 UTC