- From: Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>
- Date: Tue, 9 May 2006 14:10:09 +0200
- To: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3c.org
Hi Maciej,
On Dec 28, 2005, at 23:13, Maciej Stachowiak wrote:
> This means you need to write totally different code for matrix
> manipulation in SVG 1.1 Full DOM vs. SVG 1.2 Tiny uDOM. Is there a
> deep reason for these differences? Why not stick with a compatible
> subset of the 1.1 SVG DOM?
As explained in previous responses, it is highly unfortunate that
coordination with the JSR 226 EG failed to reconcile these, but the
SVG WG is committed to being compatible with JSR-226 and will
therefore not change the specification on this point.
Thank you very much for your comments, please let us know shortly if
these do not address your concerns,
--
Robin Berjon
Senior Research Scientist
Expway, http://expway.com/
Received on Tuesday, 9 May 2006 12:10:04 UTC