Re: SVG12: Document.documentElement definition

* Robin Berjon wrote:
>On Jan 29, 2006, at 20:46, Bjoern Hoehrmann wrote:
>> * Robin Berjon wrote:
>>> this is an answer to your comment found at:
>>>  http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Jul/0008.html
>>>
>>> The draft has been modified to fix the grammar and provide a more
>>> orthodox definition.
>>
>> Considering that reviewers still have to point out such problems, I
>> don't think this is acceptable, instead of copying and introducing
>> incompatibilities, normative reference should be used to define such
>> features.
>
>And that is what is currently being used.

Thanks,
-- 
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ 

Received on Monday, 8 May 2006 16:10:38 UTC