RE: SVG12: animating transform ref()

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net]
> Sent: den 22 mars 2006 17:00
> To: Ola Andersson
> Cc: www-svg@w3.org
> Subject: Re: SVG12: animating transform ref()
> 
> * Ola Andersson wrote:
> >parts of the smil animation features are not trivial to capture,
> >therefore the different behavior of implementations.
> 
> Thanks for pointing out the adverse relationship between unclear
> specifications and non-interoperable implementations so clearly.
> 
> >Although you might find the definition confusing we believe it
> >is correct and will leave it as is.
> 
> This is, therefore, not acceptable to me.

You don't accept that we believe the spec to be correct? Whether or not you accept our beliefs they still remain the same. We should probably close this discussion before it becomes even more philosophical.  

> --
> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/

Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 16:19:03 UTC