RE: SVG12: IDL "int"

Hi Björn,

> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann

> * Robin Berjon wrote:
> >this is an answer to your comment found at:
> >
> >
> >The draft has been changed so as to refer to "unsigned long" 
> instead of 
> >"int".
> >
> >Thank you kindly for your thorough review, please let us 
> know if this 
> >does not address your concerns.
> A curious change, considering that implementations are 
> required to store signed values in this unsigned long. 
> Doesn't really address my concern.

We agree that these references to "int" should not have been changed to "unsigned long".  They have now been changed to "long".

Please let us know, within two weeks, if this does not address your comment.

Scott Hayman
On behalf of the SVG Working Group

This transmission (including any attachments) may contain confidential information, privileged material (including material protected by the solicitor-client or other applicable privileges), or constitute non-public information. Any use of this information by anyone other than the intended recipient is prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error, please immediately reply to the sender and delete this information from your system. Use, dissemination, distribution, or reproduction of this transmission by unintended recipients is not authorized and may be unlawful.

Received on Tuesday, 14 March 2006 19:13:51 UTC