- From: Dr. Olaf Hoffmann <Dr.O.Hoffmann@gmx.de>
- Date: Mon, 31 Jul 2006 11:34:55 +0200
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: cam@mcc.id.au
Hello, I think, it has to do more with SMIL as with SVG. The timing model of SMIL is applicable here (just my interpretation): We have two intervals for the animation without end ( '[' for an inclusion of the border, ')' for exclusion): [0s, 2s) and [2s, 4s). On the other hand we have an interval determined from begin, end and dur, this is [0s, 2s). This means, normally the circle is never at the position (200,100), but if frozen exactly at 2s with end, it stops at (200,100), this is mathematically a one-side limit. This can be seen for example with the adobe plugin or Opera - I think, they are correct. Interesting testcase to see, if the SMIL timing model is implemented correctly. I already tried similar things with calcMode discrete. The only problem with this interpretation is, that SVG has not really an interval model for paths and stroke-dasharray as already mention in relation to slightly different problems (even without animation). >Hi. > >With this animation: > > <circle cx="0" cy="0" r="10"> > <animateMotion dur="4s" end="2s" calcMode="paced" fill="freeze" > path="M 100,100 L 200,100 M 100,200 L 200,200"/> > </circle> > >should the animation freeze with the position (200,100) or (100,200)?
Received on Monday, 31 July 2006 09:34:45 UTC