- From: Cyril Concolato <cyril.concolato@enst.fr>
- Date: Wed, 01 Feb 2006 08:43:42 +0100
- To: marc@beatware.com
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org, 'Bjoern Hoehrmann' <derhoermi@gmx.net>
Hi, Marc Verstaen a écrit : > Considering the number of implementations for SVG-T 1.2 already available, I > am not this proves anything about the specs of SVG-Tiny 1.2. We are not > talking about SVG 1.2 here... Can you list them? What percentage of the spec have they implemented? Are we sure they are interoperable? My 2 cents, Cyril > > Marc > >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Bjoern Hoehrmann [mailto:derhoermi@gmx.net] >> Sent: Tuesday, January 31, 2006 3:12 PM >> To: marc@beatware.com >> Cc: www-svg@w3.org >> Subject: Re: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: Too many issues (again) >> >> * Marc Verstaen wrote: >>> The working group did an awesome job with the SVG-T 1.2 specs, and we >> have >>> proof to backup this assertion. The first goal now is to release this >> spec >>> officially and start using it! >> "Its planned to make Renesis fully compatible to the SVG Spec and >> as the Spec's writing is not as good as an Implementor would need, >> there're often sessions wasted just to understand what exactly this >> means." -- http://www.gosvg.net/?p=30 >> -- >> Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de >> Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de >> 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/ > >
Received on Wednesday, 1 February 2006 07:43:49 UTC