- From: Doug Schepers <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 2006 00:25:31 -0400
- To: "'Sjoerd Visscher'" <sjoerd@w3future.com>, <www-svg@w3.org>
Hi, Sjoerd- Thanks for this analysis and explanation. Speaking for myself, I would be much happier were we to align with HTML UA behavior in this regard as much as possible. I find your and Maciej's remarks technically compelling. As an author, I would expect the kind of behavior Maciej describes. Regards- Doug Sjoerd Visscher wrote: | | It looks like this whole discussion is based on a misunderstanding of | the WebCGM spec [1]. The WebCGM spec and the de-facto HTML | standard are | not incompatible. | | Especially the clarification given by Chris Lilley in [2] is | not how I | think the WebCGM spec should be read. If Chris had been right, then | there would have been no reason for the WebCGM spec to say | that _replace | only applies to CGM-to-CGM, as it would have been very useful | for a CGM | file loaded in an iframe. | | _replace is used in WebCGM for images that are loaded in HTML | with the | img element. In CGM-to-CGM, the link target would be set as the src | attribute of the img element. And as HTML is not allowed as image | format, _replace is not applicable to CGM-to-HTML. | | The problem of reading the WebCGM spec lies in the fact that is | undefined what creates a frame. There is no doubt that html frame | elements create frames. An iframe does so too (as the name implies). | | There only remains one problem, the object tag. Does it | create a frame? | | I did some test, by loading an image, an html document and an svg | document in an object element. Internet Explorer always | creates a frame. | Firefox does not create a frame for an image, but does so for | html and | svg. Opera creates a frame for html, but not for images or svg. | (Although I'm not so sure about SVG, as Opera does not seem | to create a | frame for an SVG file in an Iframe either.) | | This explains why Boris Zbarsky was confused by the meaning | of _replace, | because Firefox always creates a frame for svg content, so _replace | never applies and always means the same as _self. | | There is one other thing: if the HTML elements and the SVG | elements are | in the same document, and the link points to another SVG | document, then | _replace could mean that the root SVG element is replaced *in | the DOM* | by the documentElement of the targeted SVG document. (A kind | of XInclude | operation.) This probably creates more problems than it solves and | _replace should in this case do the same as _self. | | [1] http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-WebCGM/REC-03-CGM-IC.html#webcgm_3_1_2_2 | [2] http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2006Jul/0031.html | | -- | Sjoerd Visscher | http://w3future.com/weblog/ |
Received on Monday, 14 August 2006 04:25:59 UTC