W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: SVG Tiny 1.2 is now a Candidate Recommendation

From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 11:08:44 -0700
Message-Id: <F1C01CB4-AE51-40E0-9CCB-D54A17B9AFFB@apple.com>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>

On Aug 10, 2006, at 7:17 AM, Chris Lilley wrote:

> Hello www-svg,
> W3C is pleased to announce that
>   Scalable Vector Graphics (SVG) Tiny 1.2 Specification
>   http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/CR-SVGMobile12-20060810/
> is a W3C Candidate Recommendation.

Could the SVG Working Group please explain which part of the W3C  
Process Document allows going directly from Working Draft (the draft  
of http://www.w3.org/TR/2006/WD-SVGMobile12-20060721/ ) to Candidate  
Recommendation, bypassing the Last Call stage?

The only valid advancement step for a Working Draft that I see in the  
Process Document is to Last Call:

"After republication as a Working Draft, the next forward step  
available to the Working Group is a Last Call announcement. The Last  
Call announcement may occur at the same time as the publication of  
the Working Draft."

The SVG Working Group did not announce a Last Call for the July 21  
Working Draft.

If the SVG Working Group has been granted an exception to the  
requirements of the W3C Process, could the WG please explain who  
granted the exception and what the justification is?

Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 18:09:21 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:14 UTC