W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > August 2006

Re: [SVGMobile12] SVGT12-207: SVG Tiny 1.2 does not comply to AWWW

From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.62.0608100725090.5340@dhalsim.dreamhost.com>

On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Chris Lilley wrote:
> I'm going to have another go to explain why the comment about 
> orthogonality and AWWW is misplaced.

I really don't think that repeating the same arguments again is going to 
convince me. I understand that the SVG working group thinks they have to 
reinvent a whole bunch of stuff, and that this is a basic difference in 
philosophy between the SVG working group and myself (and a number of other 
commenters, for that matter). I understand that we have different 
interpretations of the AWWW document, both in spirit and in letter.

I formally object to SVG Tiny 1.2 claiming that it is believed that it is 
in accordance with the principles in AWWW.

I formally object to SVG Tiny 1.2 defining a subset profile of DOM Core.

I formally object to SVG Tiny 1.2 having a wrapped-text feature.

I hope this is clear.

Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 07:29:36 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:14 UTC