- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Thu, 10 Aug 2006 07:29:18 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Thu, 10 Aug 2006, Chris Lilley wrote: > > I'm going to have another go to explain why the comment about > orthogonality and AWWW is misplaced. I really don't think that repeating the same arguments again is going to convince me. I understand that the SVG working group thinks they have to reinvent a whole bunch of stuff, and that this is a basic difference in philosophy between the SVG working group and myself (and a number of other commenters, for that matter). I understand that we have different interpretations of the AWWW document, both in spirit and in letter. I formally object to SVG Tiny 1.2 claiming that it is believed that it is in accordance with the principles in AWWW. I formally object to SVG Tiny 1.2 defining a subset profile of DOM Core. I formally object to SVG Tiny 1.2 having a wrapped-text feature. I hope this is clear. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Thursday, 10 August 2006 07:29:36 UTC