- From: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>
- Date: Fri, 28 Apr 2006 13:21:06 -0700
- To: Scott Hayman <shayman@rim.com>
- Cc: www-svg@w3c.org
On Jan 25, 2006, at 5:53 PM, Scott Hayman wrote: > Hi Maciej, > >> From: Maciej Stachowiak > >> Section 15.4 says: >> >> "Whenever a 'listener' element is removed (via uDOM, discard, >> ...), the behavior is the same as if the removeEventListener >> method was called on the observer element on which the event >> listener was registered." >> >> removeEventListener with what arguments? Does inserting a >> <listener> act as if the addEventListener method was called? >> The spec doesn't say. Neither does XML Events make any such >> claim. But if this is the intent, then again I'd ask with >> what arguments? > > We've updated the paragraph to remove mention of removeEventListener. > It now reads: > > Whenever a 'listener' element is removed (via uDOM, discard, > ...), the corresponding event listener is removed. > > Please let us know within 2 weeks if this does not address your > comment. Instead of removing the reference to removeEventListener, I would propose defining SVG 1.2's XML Events support entirely in terms of DOM Events. My objection here was that the reference was underspecified, and that there was not a corresponding reference for addEventListener. While our suggested text removes the dangling reference, it doesn't address my desire to have everything about SVG's use of XML Events to be clearly specified. Regards, Maciej
Received on Friday, 28 April 2006 20:21:35 UTC