- From: Ian Hickson <ian@hixie.ch>
- Date: Wed, 26 Apr 2006 19:02:28 +0000 (UTC)
- To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Tue, 25 Apr 2006, Chris Lilley wrote: > > > > My testing has shown that even desktop UAs tend to not bother to > > implement such syntax checking, instead recovering from syntax errors > > in proprietary ways. (For example, transform="translate(20, 0" causes > > a translation transform in all the UAs I have so far tested.) > > Thanks, that is useful testing. Could you give a pointer to the test and > a list of all the UAs you tested? Did you log bug reports on them? No (it was ad-hoc testing a while back) and probably not, since the last few times I filed bugs on browser makers saying that they didn't follow SVG's error handling rules, the response I got was "we don't care, the error handling rules in SVG are stupid". Presumably, though, the SVG working group has conducted much more detailed research on this matter. -- Ian Hickson U+1047E )\._.,--....,'``. fL http://ln.hixie.ch/ U+263A /, _.. \ _\ ;`._ ,. Things that are impossible just take longer. `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'
Received on Wednesday, 26 April 2006 19:02:45 UTC