- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2006 17:51:07 +0200
- To: <doug.schepers@vectoreal.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
* Doug Schepers wrote: >| In http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Oct/0153.html >| the SVG Working Group told me that the proposed design does indeed >| introduce the kind of incompatibility I am concerned about, > >Can you explain which incompatibily that is? If the SVG Working Group could elaborate on what is unclear about the SVG Working Group's compatibility concerns, I could try to explain the SVG Working Group's compatibility concerns to the SVG Working Group in more detail. >Can you state explicitly why you think it should be required? To ensure that the proposed SVGGlobal interface is not incompatible with a future 'Global' interace. If this 'Global' interface provides a 'document' member in the same way as http://www.w3.org/TR/Window/ proposes, they would not be compatible according to the SVG Working Group. http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Oct/0153.html discusses this problem in detail. -- Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de 68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Tuesday, 25 April 2006 15:51:18 UTC