Re: SVGT 1.2: "evt" vs "event" as the implicit event argument to event handlers from Jonathan Watt on 2006-04-24 (www-svg@w3.org from April 2006)

From: Jonathan Watt <jwatt@jwatt.org>
Date: Mon, 24 Apr 2006 22:05:47 +0100
To: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
CC: Maciej Stachowiak <mjs@apple.com>, Robin Berjon <robin.berjon@expway.fr>, www-svg@w3c.org
Message-ID: <444D3DAB.40304@jwatt.org>

Chris Lilley wrote:
> Of course, the actual parameters (variables or constants) that are
> passed to calls to the function/procedure could be called anything at
> all as long as they had the required type

Well, that's what the "evt" vs. "event" issue is about - the name in the calling 
scope, no?

Received on Monday, 24 April 2006 21:08:11 UTC