- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Thu, 22 Sep 2005 07:17:01 +0200
- To: "Doug Schepers" <doug@schepers.cc>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Thursday, September 22, 2005, 6:43:18 AM, Doug wrote: DS> Hi, WG- DS> This may be nitpicky, but I've noticed that some resources (such as the DS> links to the page) call the Working Draft "SVG Mobile," but the title of the DS> page is SVG Tiny 1.2, and Tiny is used other places as well. I think this is DS> confusing. DS> Since there is no longer an SVG Basic, IIRC, I think you should call this DS> SVG Mobile and change all references of Tiny. As you say, there is no longer an SVG Basic. Also we find that people in the Mobile industry were familiar with the term Tiny and did not use the term Mobile. Lastly, Tiny became the core profile of SVG 1.2 and thus, we think its better to deal with the confusion of naming by using the term Tiny consistently and phasing out the term Mobile. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Thursday, 22 September 2005 05:17:23 UTC