- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Mon, 31 Oct 2005 09:28:39 +0100
- To: Cameron McCormack <cam-www-svg@aka.mcc.id.au>
- Cc: www-svg@w3.org
On Monday, October 31, 2005, 9:19:44 AM, Cameron wrote: CM> Hi Anne. CM> Anne van Kesteren: >> Dear SVG WG, CM> (I'm not them, so feel free to disregard my reply as unauthoritative...) >> What is the expected rendering in the following case: >> <http://hixie.ch/tests/adhoc/svg/error/006.xml>? >> >> Should it just say "There should be no red on this page." unstyled? Should there >> be nothing visible at all or should it be styled? CM> If you are using an SVG UA to render that document, I think you should CM> get nothing since it's not a Conforming SVG Stand-Alone File[1]. If CM> you're using some other XML UA where SVG content is allowed (such as CM> XHTML+SVG) then it's not a Conforming SVG Included Document Fragment[2], CM> so also isn't good for rendering. That's a very good response, I agree completely. (Anne, I said something very similar when you asked this last week.) -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Monday, 31 October 2005 08:28:48 UTC