Re: [SVGMobile12] Missing namespace puts document in error

Hi all,

   Just so we are clear on this, it makes it impossible to have a 
SVG UA that is also a validating XML processor.  As discussed elsewhere 
if a DTD provides, for example a '#fixed' value for xmlns on 'svg' 
a conforming XML parser must expose it to the infoset, if it chooses to 
the DTD (which a validation requires), the wording below requires it not 
make use of such decl (it is not "in the document").

   If this is the case I think that there needs to be wording to this 
effect to
make is clear to everyone the real implications of this statement. wrote on 10/26/2005 01:31:21 PM:

> On Wed, 26 Oct 2005, Chris Lilley wrote:
> > 
> > IH>    User agents must only consider elements explicitly placed in 
> > IH>    SVG namespace by XML Namespace declarations in the document 
> > IH>    <svg xmlns="">) as being SVG 
> > 
> > I think your suggested wording is good. I assume you would be 
> > if we used it?
> Yup.
> -- 
> Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
>       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
> Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Wednesday, 26 October 2005 20:52:54 UTC