Re: SVG12: 19.4 example

On Monday, April 18, 2005, 12:59:22 AM, Bjoern wrote:

BH> Dear Scalable Vector Graphics Working Group,

BH>   In
BH> section 19.4 the example is not SVG Tiny 1.2, please either change
BH> the example to be a conforming SVG Tiny 1.2 document or include a
BH> proper discussion as to why SVG 1.1 examples are included.

We agree, fixed. It now says version="1.2"

BH> Further, the example makes weird use of elements in the XHTML namespace
BH> (e.g., the body of which document is this supposed to be?) Please change
BH> the draft such that it does not make weird use of elements in the XHTML
BH> namespace.

We agree that XHTML does not have a definition of a conforming XHTML
document fragment and people might assume from this example that it

We have changed the example so it makes weird use of elements that are
not in the XHTML namespace and do not even look like XHTML elements. It
should be much clearer that this is an example - the requiredFeatures
URI and the xmlns are both in, for example.

Please let us know within two weeks if this does not satisfy your

 Chris Lilley          
 Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
 W3C Graphics Activity Lead
 Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG

Received on Monday, 24 October 2005 19:01:57 UTC