- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Wed, 30 Nov 2005 17:49:16 +0100
- To: Anne van Kesteren <fora@annevankesteren.nl>
- Cc: Ola Andersson <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>, www-svg@w3.org, ian@hixie.ch
On Wednesday, November 30, 2005, 5:15:55 PM, Anne wrote: AvK> Quoting Ola Andersson <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>: >> * When the content is not well-formed according to the XML 1.0 or >> XML 1.1 specifications [XML11 <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml11> ] AvK> Does this mean that UAs have to implement XML11 in order to support SVG 1.2 AvK> Tiny? Yes. AvK> Could it be made more clear that content does not have to conform to both AvK> specifications? AvK> E.g. that I can use NEL when my XML declaration says the AvK> document is XML version 1.1 and that the document, because of those two AvK> things, AvK> can not conform to both. Right. It was not the intent to require content conformance to both - content conforms to one or the other. AvK> This can probably be done by adding a sentence to the AvK> above like "Whichever is used." or so... Sure. How about * When the content is not well-formed according to the version of XML used (either the XML 1.0 or XML 1.1 specifications [XML10] [XML11]) >> * When the content is not namespace-well-formed according to the >> Namespaces in XML 1.1 specification [XML-NS >> <http://www.w3.org/TR/xml-names11/> ] AvK> Doesn't XML-NS11 allow certain things from XML11 that are not in AvK> XML1 and that therefore you can not use XML 1.0? Yes. Content that uses XML 1.0 has to be NSWF according to Namespaces in XML and content that uses XML 1.1 has to be NSWF according to Namespaces in XML 1.1. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-xml-names-19990114/ http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/REC-xml-names11-20040204/ AvK> Wouldn't it be easier to talk about namespace-well-formed in the AvK> first place and drop the whole well-formed statement as it is made AvK> a bit irelevant by this statement? Agreed that content which is NSWF is also WF; but maybe it makes the point about WF more strongly to explicitly list it rather than to leave it implicit. -- Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org Chair, W3C SVG Working Group W3C Graphics Activity Lead Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Wednesday, 30 November 2005 16:49:49 UTC