- From: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
- Date: Tue, 29 Nov 2005 12:07:47 -0600
- To: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
- CC: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>, www-svg@w3.org
Jon Ferraiolo wrote: > We see this issue all over the place with regard to how a Full > implementation must deal with Tiny content. Precisely. That's the case I'm worried about, really. > My memory is that this issue has been discussed within the SVG WG at > length and the conclusion is that it is too complex and too much of an > implementation burden for Full implementations to have to turn off > features because the content has baseProfile='tiny'. Sounds good to me. ;) I'm just trying to reconcile that with the Tiny requirement that a UA MUST NOT render the content in question... -Boris
Received on Tuesday, 29 November 2005 18:07:58 UTC