W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > www-svg@w3.org > November 2005

RE: [SVGT 1.2] Question on sizing of the outermost <svg>

From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Nov 2005 17:49:58 -0800
Message-ID: <6ECA24BE410D994496A2AE995367C5C8376564@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
To: "Boris Zbarsky" <bzbarsky@mit.edu>, "Chris Lilley" <chris@w3.org>
Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>

"must" seems correct to me, too.

Jon Ferraiolo

-----Original Message-----
From: www-svg-request@w3.org [mailto:www-svg-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Boris Zbarsky
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2005 5:06 PM
To: Chris Lilley
Cc: www-svg@w3.org
Subject: Re: [SVGT 1.2] Question on sizing of the outermost <svg>

Chris Lilley wrote:
>     <p>Under these conditions, the 'svg' element should be treated as
>     replaced element in a CSS context, so the positioning properties
>     establish the viewport's width.</p>
> Is there any particular reason for the should, rather than a must?

No, past me writing English, not spec in that part of the mail  ;).
Making it a 
must makes sense to me.

Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 01:50:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 22:54:08 UTC