- From: Chris Lilley <chris@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 01:18:24 +0100
- To: www-svg@w3.org
- Cc: Boris Zbarsky <bzbarsky@mit.edu>
Hello www-svg,
Boris wrote:
> Does this actually say that <svg:svg> should be treated as a replaced
> element in a CSS context? If not, please say that? That will allow
> various things like the aspect ratio stuff being proposed for CSS
> replaced elements to work with SVG, which would be great.
We agree, its to be treated as a replaced element.
> Other than that, sounds fantastic. Thank you very much.
We added your suggested text, so the paragraph now reads:
<p>Under these conditions, the 'svg' element should be treated as a
replaced element in a CSS context, so the positioning properties
establish the viewport's width.</p>
Is there any particular reason for the should, rather than a must?
--
Chris Lilley mailto:chris@w3.org
Chair, W3C SVG Working Group
W3C Graphics Activity Lead
Co-Chair, W3C Hypertext CG
Received on Tuesday, 15 November 2005 00:18:24 UTC