- From: Jon Ferraiolo <jonf@adobe.com>
- Date: Wed, 2 Nov 2005 06:24:42 -0800
- To: "Jon Ferraiolo" <jonf@adobe.com>, "Bjoern Hoehrmann" <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>
[ RESEND - Somehow the last transmission got mangled. ] Bjoern and everyone, This is a follow-on response in attempt to close discussion on the original LC comment you submitted via: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Apr/0233.html and which I was the last person to complain that the text is not yet good enough: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-svg/2005Apr/0233.html Here is proposed new wording from the SVG WG on the topic which we hope expresses the processing model for 'foreignObject' clearly: --------------- The user agent must treat all of the content within a 'foreignObject' as foreign content which is to be handed off to an appropriate content handler for rendering. User agents are not required to support any particular content types via 'foreignObject'. In particular, user agents are not required to support SVG content embedded within or referenced by 'foreignObject'; SVG content within 'foreignObject' represents an extension just as with any other type of content. --------------- Please tell us within two weeks if the above text is unacceptable. Thanks. Jon Ferraiolo (for the SVG WG)
Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 14:24:29 UTC