Re: [SVGMobile12] <handler> element is necessary?

Hello Kono-san,

On 19/05/2005, at 7:17 PM, KONO Masahiko wrote:

> 15.4 The handler element
> <handler> element is different from <script> element in evaluation
> timing.  I think this difference is small.  Is <script> element which
> is added new attribute evaluate='load'|'called', and so on sufficient?

Unfortunately not. The <handler> element defines a single function to be
used as an event handler, while <script> has a different semantic  
(it's for defining all sorts of code). We think the difference is enough
to justify a different element.

> And <handler> element has ev:event attribute.  Is <script> element and
> <ev:listener> element sufficient?

This functionality is provided with XML Events.

Please respond within two weeks if you are not satisfied.


Received on Wednesday, 2 November 2005 14:12:18 UTC