Re: SVG12: getPresentation* naming

On Sat, 21 May 2005, Dean Jackson wrote:
> > 
> > Note that the SVG group published a last call draft _after_ those two 
> > e-mails were sent, without any indication that there were still known 
> > open issues. Why would you release a "last call" drafts without having 
> > dealt with all open issues, if you weren't ignoring them?
> 
> It was an update to the existing Last Call. The comments still apply.

This seems to imply that you weren't expecting this to be the last draft. 
So why was it released as a last call?


> Over the past 6 months you (and others) have submitted lots of comments 
> on SVG specifications. Without doubt, the group have made more effort to 
> accomodate your comments than any other person in history.

I'm not sure what you mean there.


> Now, on to the meat of your suggestion... can you list a list of open 
> issues? That is a good idea. We have a group-only version that Chris is 
> maintaining. We'll see if we can release it publicly.

That would be good.

-- 
Ian Hickson               U+1047E                )\._.,--....,'``.    fL
http://ln.hixie.ch/       U+263A                /,   _.. \   _\  ;`._ ,.
Things that are impossible just take longer.   `._.-(,_..'--(,_..'`-.;.'

Received on Sunday, 22 May 2005 01:08:28 UTC