- From: Bjoern Hoehrmann <derhoermi@gmx.net>
- Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2005 00:10:26 +0200
- To: "Ola Andersson" <Ola.Andersson@ikivo.com>
- Cc: <www-svg@w3.org>, "WG SVG" <w3c-svg-wg@w3.org>
* Ola Andersson wrote:
>The mail you refer to does no longer apply due to a later resolution
>in the WG. Set/getAttributeNS do apply (as written in the LC-spec)
>to svg elements.
Okay, the new example addresses my concern then, thanks.
>> >Example SVG 1.1 scripting has been changed to:
>> ><svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
>> > <rect id="myRect" x="10" y="20" width="200" height="300" fill="red"
>> > onclick="var width = parseFloat(
>> > document.getElementById('myRect').getAttributeNS(null, 'width'));
>> > document.getElementById('myRect').setAttributeNS(null, 'width',
>> (width+10));"/>
>> ></svg>
>>
>> This seems overly complex to me, I think this should be
>>
>> <svg xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" version="1.1">
>> <rect x="10" y="20" width="200" height="300" fill="red"
>> onclick="evt.target.width.baseVal.value += 10" />
>> </svg>
>
>This is not svg tiny 1.1 compliant. The idea is that the example should be
>tiny 1.1 udom compliant. We should add baseProfile="tiny" to make this clear.
If you add baseProfile="tiny" the example would be non-compliant as SVG
Tiny 1.1 does not allow the onclick attribute on <rect>. And turning it
into a SVG Basic 1.1 document does not seem useful to me; but even then,
SVG 1.1 does not mandate the 'document' object the example uses... So I
think adopting my example is best.
--
Björn Höhrmann · mailto:bjoern@hoehrmann.de · http://bjoern.hoehrmann.de
Weinh. Str. 22 · Telefon: +49(0)621/4309674 · http://www.bjoernsworld.de
68309 Mannheim · PGP Pub. KeyID: 0xA4357E78 · http://www.websitedev.de/
Received on Monday, 13 June 2005 22:09:34 UTC